Abstract:
The regulation of success fee agreements in Indonesia remains largely interpretative, characterized by the predominance of contractual freedom and the absence of explicit normative limits. This study examines the policies and challenges surrounding success fee arrangements between advocates and clients, focusing on the interplay between legal certainty, ethical boundaries, and professional standards. Using a normative juridical method that integrates statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the research explores the disharmony between the Indonesian Advocates Law, the Indonesian Advocates Code of Ethics, and the professional guidelines issued by PERADI. The findings reveal that, while success fees provide flexibility and proportional compensation based on case outcomes, the lack of uniform quantitative standards and the blurred distinction between lawful success fees and prohibited quota litis practices have created legal uncertainty. Furthermore, the ethical prohibition against remuneration solely based on case results limits the enforceability of such agreements. A comparative analysis with the English system, particularly its Conditional Fee Agreements and Damages Based Agreements, highlights the importance of transparent regulation, proportional limits, and ethical oversight to balance professional autonomy with client protection. Accordingly, this study recommends a reformulation of Indonesia’s policy framework to harmonize ethical norms and positive law, ensuring that success fee agreements promote fairness, professionalism, and legal certainty within the advocacy practice.
References
Anderson, Elliot A., ‘UNBUNDLING THE ETHICAL ISSUES OF PRO BONO ADVOCACY: ARTICULATING THE GOALS OF LIMITED‐SCOPE PRO BONO ADVOCACY FOR LIMITED LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAMS’, Family Court Review, 48.4 (2010), 685–97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01342.x
Anggo Doyoharjo, Yokhebed Arumdika Probosambodo, and FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito, ‘The Role of Advocates In Law Enforcement and Providing Legal Aid, Especially In The Religious Courts’, Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2.3 (2025), 9 https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3866
Armono, Yudhi Widyo, ‘Perjanjian Advokasi Antara Advokat Dengan Klien Dan Penentuan Besaran Honorarium’, Justicia Journal, 1.2 (2024), 132–44 https://doi.org/10.32492/jj.v12i1.12106
Assy, Rabeea, and Tomer Carmel, ‘The Impact of Legal Representation in Israeli Traffic Courts: Addressing Selection Bias and Generalizability Problems’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 21.3 (2024), 532–76 https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12392
Azeredo, Hélder, José Reis, and Agostinho Pinto, ‘Analysis of the Viability of the LexDoBusiness Collaborative Platform’, in Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on E-Business and Telecommunications (SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2020), pp. 165–72 https://doi.org/10.5220/0010001101650172
Bai, Min, Luxi Shen, Yue Li, and Chia-Feng (Jeffrey) Yu, ‘Does Legal Justice Promote Stakeholder Justice? Evidence from a Judicial Reform in China’, International Review of Financial Analysis, 94 (2024), 103326 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103326
Benvenuti, Stefano, Chiuhui Mary Wang, and Simona Borroni, ‘Perspectives, Expectations, and Concerns of European Patient Advocates on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products’, Frontiers in Medicine, 8 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.728529
Biggar, Jeffrey, ‘Approaching Negotiations in Urban Redevelopment Projects: A Multiple Case Analysis of Stakeholder Involvement in Community Benefit Agreements’, Planning Theory & Practice, 22.5 (2021), 725–46 https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1972129
Bosio, Erica, Simeon Djankov, Edward Glaeser, and Andrei Shleifer, ‘Public Procurement in Law and Practice’, American Economic Review, 112.4 (2022), 1091–1117 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20200738
Burbank, Stephen B., and Sean Farhang, ‘A New (Republican) Litigation State?’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565995
Cheng, Edward K., Paul H. Edelman, and Brian T. Fitzpatrick, ‘Fair Division of Attorneys’ Fees’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3235579
Cheng, Edward K, Paul H Edelman, and Brian T Fitzpatrick, ‘Distributing Attorney Fees in Multidistrict Litigation’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 13.1 (2021), 558–94 https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laab002
Cuenca Pinkert, David, ‘A Comparative Study of the Reimbursement of Extrajudicial Attorneys’ Fees’, CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 15.1 (2023), 297–312 https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2023.7542
Dor, Gal, and Joseph A. Grundfest, ‘Lodestar Multipliers in Delaware and Federal Attorney Fee Awards’, 2025 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5379166
Duri, Jorum, ‘Dirty Money as Legal Fees in Namibia and Zimbabwe: Are Lawyers Laundering Proceeds of Crime?’, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23.2 (2020), 315–26 https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-08-2019-0067
Dwisvimiar, Inge, ‘Keadilan Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu Hukum’, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11.3 (2011), 522–31 https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.179
Egbumokei, Peter Ifechukwude, Ikiomoworio Nicholas Dienagha, Wags Numoipiri Digitemie, Ekene Cynthia Onukwulu, and Olusola Temidayo Oladipo, ‘Strategic Contract Management for Drilling Efficiency and Cost Reduction: Insights and Perspectives’, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5.5 (2024), 1042–50 https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.5.1042-1050
Felső, Flóra, Sander Onderstal, and Jo Seldeslachts, ‘The Pricing Structure of Legal Services: Do Lawyers Offer What Clients Want?’, Review of Industrial Organization, 61.2 (2022), 123–48 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-022-09868-9
Gabuthy, Yannick, Emmanuel Peterle, and Jean-Christian Tisserand, ‘Legal Fees, Cost-Shifting Rules and Litigation: Experimental Evidence’, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 93 (2021), 101705 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101705
George, Mary, and Mufadhal, ‘ADVOCATE HONORARIUM IN AN IJĀRAH BIL ‛AMĀL CONTRACT’, JURISTA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 6.2 (2022), 132–53 https://doi.org/10.22373/jurista.v6i2.63
Hsu, Ching‐fang, Ivan Kan‐hsueh Chiang, and Yun‐chien Chang, ‘Lawyers’ Legal Aid Participation: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 21.2 (2024), 337–74 https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12385
Hunter, Richard J., and John H. Shannon, ‘Avoiding Common Conflicts of Interest in the Lawyer-Client Relationship’, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9.11 (2022), 119–31 https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.911.13386
Hutchinson, Allan C., ‘Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?’, Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 36 (2020), 184–92 https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6419
Jacob, Susan, Prisly Mary Jacob, Jo Cheriyan, and Safad Ismail, ‘Legal Assistance Redefined: Transforming Legal Access with AI-Powered LegalLink’, in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES) (IEEE, 2024), pp. 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1109/SPICES62143.2024.10779909
Jamshed, Jibran, Naila Kareem, Waheed Rafique, and Muhammad Waqas Javed, ‘An Empirical Study of Lawyer-Client Relationships in Punjab, Pakistan’, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 29.3 (2022), 335–51 https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2022.2101461
Jennejohn, Matthew, Julian Nyarko, and Eric L. Talley, ‘Contractual Evolution’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3810214
Jurns, Carolyn, ‘Policy Advocacy Motivators and Barriers: Research Results and Applications’, OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 24.3 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol24No03PPT63
Kinanty, Dhea, Pramestia Andini Putri, and Fauziah Lubis, ‘Peranan Advokat Dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu Berdasarkan UU No 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang Bantuan Hukum’, As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5.2 (2023), 451–61 https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v5i2.2695
Konin, Vladimir, ‘Does the Defense Lawyer Have the Right to Discuss the Fee of the Lawyer Represening the Victim in a Court Hearing?’, Siberian Criminal Process and Criminalistic Readings, 1 (43), 2024, 43–49 https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6122.2024.1.43-49
Legg, Michael, and Felicity Bell, Artificial Intelligence and the Legal Profession (Hart Publishing, 2020) https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509931842
Lin, Chang-Ching, Yun-chien Chang, and Kong-Pin Chen, ‘Knowledge in Youth Is Wisdom in Age: An Empirical Study of Attorney Experience in Torts Litigation’, International Review of Law and Economics, 63 (2020), 105913 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105913
Magesh, Varun, Faiz Surani, Matthew Dahl, Mirac Suzgun, Christopher D. Manning, and Daniel E. Ho, ‘Hallucination‐Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading Legal Research Tools’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 22.2 (2025), 216–42 https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12413
von Malmborg, Fredrik, ‘Exploring Advocacy Coalitions for Energy Efficiency: Policy Change through Internal Shock and Learning in the European Union’, Energy Research & Social Science, 80 (2021), 102248 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102248
Osório, António, and Barbara Luppi, ‘Argumentation Quantity and Quality: A Litigation Success Function’, International Review of Law and Economics, 59 (2019), 21–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.05.001
Park, Sung-Hoon, ‘Contingent Fees and Endogenous Timing in Litigation Contests’, European Journal of Law and Economics, 54.3 (2022), 453–73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09743-8
Peyer, Sebastian, ‘Competition Litigation Funding’, in Research Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law in the EU (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023), pp. 357–84 https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377523.00021
Popov, Oleksandr, ‘“Success Fee” of an Advocate: On the Way to the Unity of Judicial Practice’, Theory and Practice of Jurisprudence, 1.21 (2022), 18–35 https://doi.org/10.21564/2225-6555.2022.21.260038
Pramudita, Laurentius Ervin Ricky, and Retno Dewi Pulung Sari, ‘Legal Implications of Coercive Success Fee Demands by Attorneys Promising Victory Before Case Resolution’, Reformasi Hukum, 28.2 (2024), 102–12 https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v28i2.1032
Spier, Kathryn E., and Michael Rosenberg, ‘A Game Changer for Attorney Fees: Benchmarking Against Settlement Offers’, 2024 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5008392
Sundari, Elisabeth, Helidorus Chandera Halim, and Ousu Mendy, ‘Should Indonesia Adopt Legal Representation in Civil Cases?’, Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5.2 (2025), 554–80 https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.604
Thompson, Rebecca L., Jessica Belokas, Katherine Johnson, and Ashley L. Williams, ‘The Public Policy Advocacy Actions Checklist: Success Stories from Three States’, Behavior Analysis in Practice, 18.2 (2025), 594–611 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00874-1
Tiwari, Anurag, Ratnesh Singh, Ayush Tripathi, Sarthak Gupta, Utkarsh Upadhyay, and Vineet Singh, ‘Hybrid Lawyer Recommendation System Based on AGE-MOEA’, in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics (ICDCECE) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCECE53908.2022.9792700
Toy-Cronin, Bridgette, Louisa Choe, and Kayla Stewart, ‘“A Lot of People Are Paying like $5 a Week for 20 Years”: New Zealand Lawyers, Discounts, and Payment Plans’, International Journal of the Legal Profession, 28.3 (2021), 335–49 https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2020.1863219
Triyanto, Gatot, Frandy Risona Tarigan, Echwan Iriyanto, and Encik Lukmanul Hakim, ‘Juridical Review of the Honorarium Received Advocates from the Crime of Money Laundering’, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION RESEARCH STUDIES, 03.06 (2023) https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V03I6Y2023-03
Tuslian, Widya Naseva, ‘Assessing Development of Access to Justice in Indonesia Through Capability Approach’, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance (ICLAVE 2019) (Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020) https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200321.030
Umar, Islamiati M., Nirwan Junus, and Melissa Towadi, ‘Legal Protection Of Clients Without Contract On Legal Services According To Consumer Protection Law’, Estudiante Law Journal, 3.3 (2021), 389–407 https://doi.org/10.33756/eslaj.v3i3.16230
Utari Dewi, Theresia Gst Agung Indah, and Nyoman Martana, ‘Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Penyimpanan Akta In Originali Sebagai Minuta Akta’, Acta Comitas, 5.2 (2020), 221 https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.v05.i02.p01
Wardantik, Yuli Endah, Khoidin, and Wahyu Prawesthi, ‘LEGAL LIABILITY FOR NOTARIES DUE TO THE ISSUANCE OF AUTHENTIC DEEDS RESULTING IN STATE LOSSES’, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2023, 23–38 https://doi.org/10.56943/jssh.v2i1.264
Whalen-Bridge, Helena, ‘Access to Justice in Singapore: A Government and Lawyer Dynamic’, in The Role of Lawyers in Access to Justice (Cambridge University Press, 2022), pp. 162–77 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042253.012
Zafar, Ammar, ‘Balancing the Scale: Navigating Ethical and Practical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Integration in Legal Practices’, Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4.1 (2024), 27 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00121-8
Zaytsev, Vladimir V., ‘Contingency Fee: Statutory Regulation, Features of Fixing in an Agreement, Risks, Judicial Practice’, Advocate’s Practice, 2 (2023), 35–39 https://doi.org/10.18572/1999-4826-2023-2-35-39
Алексеева, Юлия Сергеевна, and Мария Александровна Сиротина, ‘Lawyer’s Contingency Fee: Law Enforcement Problems’, ЖУРНАЛ ПРАВОВЫХ И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ, 2, 2021, 44–49 https://doi.org/10.26163/GIEF.2021.95.50.006